1. Call talkback radio programs, and raise your concerns.
2. Write a letter to the Editor (refer to the attached list of addresses).
3. Attend your local council meeting, or phone your local councillors, and ask them to raise a motion supporting GE-free Council food services & a ban on the release of GMOs within their Municipality. If they don't 'have enough information' offer to supply them with the Information Pack & request a meeting to get their feedback on it.
4. Write to or call David Llewellyn (State Minister for Primary Industries), and Jim Bacon (Premier) and demand a halt to the release of GMOs into the Tasmanian environment for both trial and commercial purposes. Tell them that we need both rigorous proof that GMOs pose no threat to human health or the environment, and an international consumer acceptance of GE before Tasmania should allow GE here.
5. Write to or call PM John Howard, the Federal Health Minister Michael Wooldridge and State Health Minister Judy Jackson, MHA, and demand that they make labeling of products containing GMO's and their derivatives compulsory. Tell them that you do not accept that refined GE products may not be labelled.
6. Phone, or better still, visit your local
supermarket and ask to speak to
the manager. Ask her/him whether or not they stock GE food,
and how you can tell if you're buying it. Tell them you won't
buy any of their products unless you know they're GE free, ask
for clear labeling of GE produce, and suggest they make their
own home brand GE free. Buy organic wherever possible certified
organic producers are one of the few sources of food guaranteed
GE free, and look for non-GE labels.
7. Contact companies that process foods
and ask them about their GE
status. This is an easy one to do, as you need minimal information
to raise your concerns, and most processed products have a free
customer information hotline number written on them somewhere.
Ask them for a written response, and tell them you won't buy
any products containing GMO's. Congratulate those that have become,
or are in the process of becoming, GE free. To contact a wider
range of companies, get your hands on a copy of the Australian
Consumers' Association GE Information brochure (see GE-Free Tasmania
or the Tasmanian Environment Centre), for a list of companies
with free-call 1800 numbers.
8. Ask your local restaurant or café if they know whether or not their food is GE free. If they don't, suggest that they ask us to help them conduct a free audit. Tell them that if they compile a complete list of all of their ingredients, we can assist them in their audit by investigating the products, and suggest potential non-GE alternatives.
9. Surf the Net Get informed, and have your say at;
http://www.gm1.com
http://www.connectotel.com/gmfoods
10. There are news services covering GE issues at:
* The Organic Federation of Australia has
a very informative site at
http://www.ofa.org.au
* Subscribe to Planet Ark's free, daily environment news service, which feature GE issues at wenremote@planetark.org
* Visit CHOICE Online a group devoted to heightening consumer awareness on a number of issues. Use their search engine to view updates on GE at http://www.choice.com.au.
All of these sites will have links to other sites of interest - happy delving!
11. Share your ideas, information and concerns
with family and friends.
The more people become informed, the less they like the idea of
genetic engineering in any form.
*Come to a GE-Free Tasmania meeting, held
on Monday nights at 6:30 pm, at Bob Brown's Office, 9th floor
of the Marine Board Building, Hobart. For more information call
0418 564 019.
*Or, come to the upcoming drinks night, and talk to us about your
interest in genetic engineering. There are many tasks, large
and small, that need people to complete them, so whether you'd
be interested in writing addresses on envelopes, talking with
community groups, helping cafes go GE-free or writing a submission
to the Federal Government, we're sure to have a job you can help
with. We also have a wide array of information on various aspects
of the GE issues, which you are welcome to browse through if you'd
like more in-depth information.
Questions worth asking on radio, in letters, and of politicians:
* Why are the locations of uncontained crop
trials of potatoes, canola and poppies being kept secret from
the public?
* Has there been any investigation into the potential losses to
Tasmania if we lose our GE free status?
* Will farmers be compensated for lost revenue to South East Asia,
Europe and Japan, where they will no longer be able to export
their produce?
* Will there be any compensation of organic farmers, who will
lose their certification if their crops are found to have crossed
with GE crops from neighbouring properties?
How to contact your elected representatives:
* Premier Jim Bacon, David Llewellyn, and
Judy Jackson can be contacted at: Parliament House
Hobart, TAS, 7000
* David Llewellyn may be contacted directly by email or phone. If you send him an e-mail, write to both david.llewellyn@dpiwe.tas.gov.au and susand@dpiwe.tas.gov.au (his secretary, who will make sure he sees it). Call his office on 62 336454 to register your support for his GE free position, as they are keeping a tally of supporters and non-supporters.
* PM John Howard and Michael Wooldridge
can be contacted at:
Parliament House
Canberra, ACT, 2600
Points to Raise with David Llewellyn
Llewellyn's responsibility to act
* If Llewellyn's government is serious about keeping its options
open on the GMO issue, it must halt expanding crop trials now.
He's said that he will legislate a moratorium on trials, which
is great, but we're still waiting for it to be enshrined in legislation.
* If genetic contamination of industries that want to remain GE-free
(salmon, viticulture, pome fruit, dairy, beekeepers etc, see following
for industry statements) occurs, Llewellyn must accept responsibility
for the huge economic loss to the state
* He has the power to act to halt GE contamination in exactly
the same way he acted on diseased Canadian salmon
* Glib rhetorical commitment to a cautious approach may wash with
the public now; it will not excuse him if Tasmania loses its GE-free
status through his inaction and it will be Llewellyn who wears
the consequences
* Merely asking farmers not to proceed with GE trials, without
enacting legislation to formalise the moratorium base or providing
compensation for those people already engaged in contracts (as
Llewellyn did in late May) will be utterly ineffectual
Why any suggestion of GE and GE-free zones
will be inoperable in practice
* Risk of real genetic contamination
* Risk of perceived contamination/ contamination by association
(equally damaging to our trade prospects)
* Segregation costs have proved prohibitive to those countries
which have attempted to produce both
Why Llewellyn's suggested restriction of
a moratorium or ban to food crops is completely unacceptable
* Genes travel via outcrossing between related species and horizontal
gene transfer through the wider ecosystem
* For example, GE eucalypt use in the plantation sector will inevitably
lead to GE contamination of the state's honey industry
* Any exemption for poppy producers from a state ban will make
a mockery of our commitment to clean green industry. The loss
to key Tasmanian industry sectors of 'contamination by association'
far outweighs the economic contribution to the state from the
poppy sector (and let's face it, Tasmanian Alkaloids' threat to
leave the state if a GE-free decision was made is pretty empty)
* Regardless of whether the State government deems GE to be compatible
with clean green production, our international trade partners
reject GE outright
Key process problems
* The Food Industry Council's submission process, which asks producers
to provide their opinion on where Tasmania should go with the
GE issue after one day's information exchange, is inadequate
* Llewellyn must make public what sources of information his Department
is seeking additional to the FICT's recommendation
* Buz Green, Director of Serve-Ag (running the GE trials, key
advocate of the state's adoption of GE) sits on the six person
Board of the Department of State Development to whom the FICT
provides information. This is inappropriate and a clear conflict
of interest.